Freedom, Responsibility, and Terrorism – The Farcical Ferguson Report

Freedom, Responsibility, and Terrorism – The Farcical Ferguson Report


     Freedom suggests unregulated uncontrolled behavior. Obviously, true freedom is a myth or a perception erroneously subscribed to by those who ignore reality. The Framers, Founders, and the generations of men and women who gave birth to these United States of America clearly understood that “true freedom is bound by God’s intention”. Using such words as “endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights”; or “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”, those patriots clearly evince and define an understanding of the immutable truths of science and history ignored in our time.


     Law, be it natural law – all order we are incapable of creating or instituting, and laws of worldly origin – norms, political laws, all laws of human invention, gives order while necessarily limiting unjust freedom. Understanding that law bound by justice enables successful and constructive human interaction, it was the Framers’ intention that government establish justice.


     Contrary to and countering that intention is any behavior that is unjust violating the definition of justice imposed by immutable Law. Again, law bound by justice offers all obedient to law the only true freedom accessible in reality. Because freedom is bound by law, truth or the valid expression of law is inextricably linked to the fulfillment of the best of the human experience.


     In a spectrum from terrorism to legalism, we encounter the political manifestations of human arrogance and failure. What transpired last night in the darkness of 11 March, 2015 in Ferguson, Missouri, was the full manifestation of the absence of justice. Whatever the cause or motivation, the shooting of innocent police officers doing their job trying to protect those “unalienable Rights” of law-abiding citizens bore witness to political failure. Carried out by criminals shooting the officers, those aiding and abetting the criminals – the “protestors” were complicit in their crime and injustice. Whether blocking the street in clear violation of Missouri state law, or protesting that which is contrary to the truth, all those in the crowd are no better than, and should rightfully be called, terrorists. Willful knowing violation of the law seeking to disrupt, deny, subvert, or hinder justice for all is what terrorists do. Perhaps lesser in degree, by ignoring truth and subverting justice, all those lending their presence to those violating the law and ignoring justice should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Along with the looters and arsonists preceding them, those blocking the street robbed those lawfully using the thoroughfare. Just being in the mob stole the “domestic tranquility”.


     Perhaps the unspoken tragedy of the night’s terror was the unjust disparagement heaped on working men and women of race or color. These were the members of the churches and civic organizations in Ferguson and surrounding communities who seek to be judged by their helping the victims of the terror caused by the prior political failure without discrimination. These are the friends and neighbors comprising the vast majority of Ferguson embarrassed by the politicians falsely claiming to represent them. This is no different than the disgust and contempt Moslems wanting goodness and justice for themselves and their families hold for ISIS, al Qaeda, or any terrorist group.


Freedom is never free!


     The NBA consists of 76 percent black players. But blacks are just 13 percent of the country. Clearly, the league engages in racial discrimination against whites. Silly, right? Well, this is exactly what the sleight-of-hand Department of Justice pulled off to find that the Ferguson Police Department engages in “implicit and explicit racial bias”!


The report insults anybody who’s ever studied the statistics ?- or logic.


The 105-page report concludes: “Ferguson’s law enforcement practices are shaped by the City’s focus on revenue rather than by public safety needs. This emphasis on revenue has compromised the institutional character of Ferguson’s police department, contributing to a pattern of unconstitutional policing, and has also shaped its municipal court, leading to procedures that raise due process concerns and inflict unnecessary harm on members of the Ferguson community. Further, Ferguson’s police and municipal court practices both reflect and exacerbate existing racial bias, including racial stereotypes. Ferguson’s own data establish clear racial disparities that adversely impact African Americans. The evidence shows that discriminatory intent is part of the reason for these disparities. Over time, Ferguson’s police and municipal court practices have sown deep mistrust between parts of the community and the police department, undermining law enforcement legitimacy among African Americans in particular.”


The Washington Post immediately put out an article headlined “The 12 key highlights from the DOJ’s scathing Ferguson report.” Per the Post, the “scathing” statistic first listed is this: Ferguson is 67 percent black, but blacks comprised 85 percent of the traffic stops and 93 percent of the arrests. Incontrovertible proof that the Ferguson PD engages in institutional racism! Reporters, in describing the Ferguson report, used adjectives that include “shocking,” “stunning” and “eye-popping.”


But if Ferguson’s numbers are “eye-popping,” what adjective applies to the New York City Police Department. New York City is 25 percent black. However, of the traffic stops, blacks comprise 55 percent. The statistical “gap” is 30 points. In Ferguson, as stated, the black population is 67 percent, but 85 percent of the traffic stops. The statistical “gap” is 18 points — far smaller than New York’s 30-point “gap “.


Why aren’t Messrs. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Eric Holder marching on Times Square?


The answer is that the liberal former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who governed for 12 years, defends the aggressive policing of the NYPD — and the resulting “statistical disparities”. Bloomberg says: “Unlike many cities, where wealthy areas get special treatment, the NYPD targets its manpower to the areas that suffer the highest crime levels.


Ninety percent of all people killed in our city — and 90?percent of all those who commit the murders and other violent crimes — are black and Hispanic. It is shameful that so many elected officials and editorial writers have been largely silent on these facts.


“Instead, they have argued that police stops are discriminatory because they do not reflect the city’s overall census numbers. By that flawed logic, our police officers would stop women as often as men and senior citizens as often as young people. To do so would be a colossal misdirection of resources and would take the core elements of police work — targeting high-crime neighborhoods and identifying suspects based on evidence — out of crime-fighting. …”


“That the proportion of stops generally reflects our crime numbers does not mean … that the police are engaged in racial profiling; it means they are stopping people in those communities who fit descriptions of suspects or are engaged in suspicious activity.”


The National Institute of Justice is the research and evaluation agency of the DOJ. In 2013, the NIJ published its study called “Race, Trust and Police Legitimacy.” Unlike when responding to dispatch calls, police officers exercise more discretion when it comes to traffic stops. Thus, the supposedly “racial profiling” cops can have a field day when it comes to traffic stops, right?


But according to the NIJ, 3 out of 4 black drivers admit being stopped by police for a “legitimate reason.” Blacks, compared to whites, were on average more likely to commit speeding or other traffic offenses. “Seatbelt usage,” said the NIJ, “is chronically lower among black drivers. If a law enforcement agency aggressively enforces seatbelt violations, police will stop more black drivers.” The NIJ conclusion? Numerical disparities result from “differences in offending” in addition to “differences in exposure to the police” and “differences in driving patterns.”


President Obama, backed by research from the left and from the right, said, “Children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of school and 20 times more likely to end up in prison.”


Richmond, Virginia, is a city of 214,000, with a black population of 50 percent. Eighty-six percent of black Richmond families are headed by a single parent. Of Ferguson’s 67 percent black population, how many kids grew up in fatherless homes?


Whatever the answer, isn’t this a far more relevant statistic?


Larry Elder is a best-selling author and radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an “Elderado,” visit Follow Larry on Twitter @larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at