Protect and Defend

Protect and Defend


    Of all of the many Framers’ and Founders’ original intentions that standout, three are now totally disregarded in the political onslaught. Equal opportunity, limited government, and, most important, justice for all have been sacrificed in the quest for political power. No longer is the attack on America concealed in the constant lies and deceptions emanating from false propaganda of the liberal media and the candidates they support. Under attack as never before, we, the people are responsible. Hearing what we want to hear, we are tolerant of injustice, bribed by offerings satisfying selfish indulgence, and unaccepting of morality and righteousness. Except for the true patriots, service and sacrifice are never translated into actions that elevate and benefit all. Special interests through unjust corrupt political influence enslave us.


When political corruption allowed a former president to escape conviction for perjury, justice for all was lost in the septic tank of indifference and unjust privilege. Also under the watch of this same president, missile guidance secrets critical to our national security landed in the hands of our enemies giving them the ability to target our homeland. Now his spouse, complicit in the Benghazi tragedy, is avoiding justice. This long train of abuses terribly denigrating our entire order of law began long ago in the Arkansas political arena. Not surprisingly, until their occupancy, the Clinton White House was the only one not achieving full national security clearance.


With the tyranny of the Supreme Court, now egregiously populated by enemies of the Constitution, judicial activism defying even common sense and natural Law has descended to heretofore unconscionable levels of injustice. Again, injustice is enabled by politically sanctioned violation of the Constitution.


The outrageous out-of-control national debt being passed on to our children and taxation without representation spotlight the abyss holding the Framers’ intention for limited government. The primary intention defining states’ rights has been ignored by politicians intending to make government a god.


Equal opportunity, the “unalienable Right” to pursue happiness, has been sequestered into the hands of the rich and politically indulged. The following article by Ken Blackwell is telling.




Corporate Clinton

J. Kenneth Blackwell

28 June, 2016

    Many leaders of big business support Hillary Clinton. Last week she announced a list of 56 corporate backers. No wonder Bernie Sanders is still running against her.

    Hillary Clinton always has attracted well-connected business supporters. Even before she ran for office. Remember the lucrative cattle trades when she was Arkansas first lady? That came from a local businessman who knew how important it was to have friends in the governor’s mansion.

Bill Clinton had plenty of business support when he ran for president. As New York senator she was quite friendly with Wall Street—a relationship that continued afterwards, with her being paid queenly sums for talks which probably did not emphasize how she was fighting for the common man and woman. While secretary of state corporate behemoths were generous with donations to her family foundation.

Now big business is coming out for her in the presidential race. Admittedly, not all are traditional firms. Magic Johnson, the former basketball player, made the list as Chairman and CEO, Magic Johnson Enterprises. So did Erroll Davis, retired chancellor of the University System of Georgia. State colleges are more politics than business.

What stands out among the companies are the names of those whose business depends on government regulation or largesse. It’s impossible to know what Donald Trump would do in such cases. But we do know what Hillary Clinton would do: Keep the corporate welfare flowing.

For instance, there’s Dan Akerson, former chairman and CEO of Government Motors, er, I mean General Motors. Richard Anderson, Executive Chairman of Delta Airlines, which is at the mercy of government policy at almost every point in its operations. James Bell, former corporate president and CFO of Boeing. Indeed, in the recent battle over the Export-Import Bank, long known as Boeing’s Bank, Hillary Clinton, in contrast to most of the GOP presidential contenders, stood fast for corporate profit at taxpayer expense.

There’s Robert Burt, former chairman of the Business Roundtable, which has been a steadfast supporter of corporate welfare. And Margot Dorfman, President and CEO of the U.S. Women’s Chamber of Commerce. Her group wants lots of government programs.

Another name on the list is James J. Murren, Chairman and CEO of MGM Resorts International. It’s hard to get more political than the gambling industry. Can you say support for stadium subsidies and antitrust exemption? Gary Rodkin, the retired CEO of ConAgra Foods. There are farm subsidies aplenty.

Of course, all of these executives may be backing Hillary Clinton because they believe she is most likely to bring peace to the Middle East, deter Chinese expansion, and contend with Brexit. Still, surely they, like Sen. Sanders, are aware that Clinton always has been a soft touch when it comes to well-heeled businessmen and women.

Earlier this year Michael Bloomberg bluntly declared: “The Republican Party is no longer the party of business.” He complained that the GOP was appealing to … union members. For instance, while business leaders supported federalizing education through the Common Core, Republicans opposed it: “Some crazy right wing people claimed it was a federal program.”

I guess we can argue whether it’s more regulation or “program,” as if that matters. It certainly is control. Which is why conservatives oppose it.

We see much the same phenomenon with religious liberty. Corporate behemoths are lining up with government, ready to crush small enterprises underfoot if they do not genuflect before the idol of social liberalism.

Big business long ago made its peace with the regulatory Leviathan. Indeed, regulation is a competitive advantage for large firms. The losers are small enterprises: the proverbial “little guy,” like the wedding photographer, baker, and event site. The big companies don’t much care who gets run over by history so long as they are friends of the driver—in this case Hillary Clinton.

Of course Republican candidates should seek support from corporate executives just like anyone else. Many do believe in limited government and individual liberty. And the GOP should be pro- free market, with regulation focused on ensuring a fair process. The objective should not be pro- business per se.

Similarly, the party should be in favor of free bargaining between labor and management over wages and working conditions. And ensuring that the rules are fair to all. That means being friends of working people, not Big Unions.

Alas, economic privilege, not fairness, always has been Hillary Clinton’s agenda. Which is why some corporate executives are joining her campaign.

Ken Blackwell is Senior Fellow for Human Rights and Constitutional Governance at Family Research Council Action.